Suddenly, creating jobs is out, wow gold inflicting pain is in. Condemning deficits and refusing to helpwow gold a still-struggling economy has become the new fashion everywhere, including the United States, where 52 wow gold senators against extending aid to the unemployed despite the highest rate of long-term joblessness since the
1930s. Many economists, myself included, regard this turn to austerity as a huge mistake. It raises memories of 1937, when F.D.R.’s premature attempt to
balance the wow gold budget helped plunge a recovering economy back into severe recession. And here in Germany, a
few scholars see parallels to the policies of Heinrich Brüning, the chancellor from 1930 to 1932, whose devotion to financial orthodoxy ended up sealing
the doom of the Weimar Republic. But despite these warnings


the deficit wow gold hawks are prevailing in most places — and nowhere more than here, where the government
has pledged 80 billion euros, almost $100 billion, in tax increases and spending cuts even though the economy continues to operate far below capacity.
What’s the economic logic wow gold behind the government’s moves? The answer, as far as I cantell, is that there isn’t any. Press German officials to explain wow gold why they need to impose austerity on a depressed economy,wow gold and you get rationales that don’t add up. Point this out, and they come up with different rationales, which also don’t add up. Arguing with German deficit hawks feels more than a bit like arguing with U.S. wow gold Iraq hawks back in 2002: wow gold They know what they want to do, and every time you refute one argument, they just come up with another.